<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook 2007 dropped print range &#8211; WTF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.donkitchen.com/2009/04/23/outlook-2007-dropped-print-page-range-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.donkitchen.com/2009/04/23/outlook-2007-dropped-print-page-range-why/</link>
	<description>family, kids, tech, and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.donkitchen.com/2009/04/23/outlook-2007-dropped-print-page-range-why/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donkitchen.com/?p=238#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Too funny.  Thanks for pointing this out.  I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right in that they didn&#039;t want people to know something so basic was left out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too funny.  Thanks for pointing this out.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right in that they didn&#8217;t want people to know something so basic was left out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Waldner</title>
		<link>http://www.donkitchen.com/2009/04/23/outlook-2007-dropped-print-page-range-why/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>John Waldner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donkitchen.com/?p=238#comment-130</guid>
		<description>In case you weren&#039;t aware, Office 2007 SP2, release shortly after your post, has now fixed this issue.
Remarkably, Microsoft are very quiet on this and it is not in the main release notes...perhaps they don&#039;t want to admit this ridiculously enviromentally unfriendly bug existed in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you weren&#8217;t aware, Office 2007 SP2, release shortly after your post, has now fixed this issue.<br />
Remarkably, Microsoft are very quiet on this and it is not in the main release notes&#8230;perhaps they don&#8217;t want to admit this ridiculously enviromentally unfriendly bug existed in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

